Blog

Right to Legal Aid and Access To Justice

Right to legal aid mainly means free legal aid should be provided to the poor and the weaker section of the society so that the justice should be provided to them at an affordable price. This provision is mainly mentioned mainly in Article 39A of the Constitution of India. And is also a part of fundamental rights as fundamental rights are enforceable by the court of law and if violated a strict action is to be taken for it.

So, recently there was a judgment of the Supreme Court in 2016 which says that the right to legal aid is guaranteed under article 14 and 21 of the Indian constitution. There was a bench of five benches consisting of Chief Justice of India T.S. Thakur, Justices Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla, A.K. Sikri, S.A. Bobde, and R. Banumathi which has given the above-mentioned judgment

This bench has further observed that “life” implies not only in the physical sense but it also includes bundles of rights which will not affect the quality of life so as to access to the right to access to justice out of the purview of the right enshrined under article 21 of the Indian constitution.

The essence of access to justice

There are mainly 4 main points which lead to access of justice to the people. They are as follows-

The need for the adjudicatory mechanism

One of the main reasons for the establishment of the adjudicatory mechanism is to provide the justice to the people whether described as the court, tribunals, commission or authority or called by any other name so that the people can agitate their grievances and seek adjudication whenever they feel like. The adjudicatory mechanism should not only be effective but it should be just and fair to the people of India. So all the court, tribunals etc should not only be just and itself but it should also follow the principle of natural justice. The principle of natural justice mainly consists of two principles i.e., Audi Alterem Partem (to hear the other side) and Nemo Judex Causa Sua which means no one can be a judge in his own case. These two principles should be followed.

The mechanism must be conveniently accessible in terms of justice

The courts, tribunals should be easily accessible to the people so that they can get justice easily. It mainly depends upon the litigants that how he/she presents the case in front of the court, tribunals etc as the judgment will be given on the basis of the facts and circumstances present before them so it is the duty of the client to appoint proper litigant for the case so that access to justice becomes easy to them.

The process of adjudicator must be speedy

Access to justice is given the constitutional value but it will be of no use if speedy justice is not provided to the people. There is a famous saying “justice delayed is justice denied”. This means that if there is no speedy justice which is provided to the people then the justice is denied. If the dispensation of justice is so laborious, time-consuming, indolent and frustrating to the person who is seeking for justice will not only deny accessing of justice but justice itself.

There is the famous case of Sheela Barse. in this case, the court declared that the speedy trial is the facet of right to life and if this trial goes on endlessly the right to life will be violated. The government has also taken various steps to solve this problem by making subordinate courts so that the people whose case are not that big can get speedy justice and the access to justice also becomes easy for the people.

The process of adjudication must be affordable to the disputants

Article 39 A of the Constitution of India consists of the right to legal aid. This legal aid should mainly be provided to the poor and weaker section of the society so that justice should be provided to the needy people at the affordable price.

How to Get Anticipatory Bail in India?

Bail implies impermanent arrival of a charged individual anticipating preliminary, in some cases on condition that an aggregate of cash is held up to ensure their appearance in court. At the end of the day discharge or secure the arrival of a detainee on an instalment of safeguard. It might be characterized as security. For example, money, a security, or property, swore or given to a court by or for the benefit of one blamed for carrying out a wrongdoing, to acquire discharge from detainment and to guarantee the individual's future appearance in court when required amid the criminal continuing.

Safeguard is cash or some property that is stored or vowed to a court, keeping in mind the end goal to anchor the discharge from authority or prison of a speculate who has been captured, with the understanding that the suspect will return for their preliminary and required court appearances. From the above, to finish up what safeguard is, as an idea in law, implies a charged is conceded discharge from guardianship fro officers of the law (the police) and into the authority of a man that is ordinarily referred to the blamed as sureties.

Anticipatory Bail – Objectives

The object of arrest and its detention of the accused person is primarily to secure his appearance at the time of trial and to ensure that in case he is found guilty he is available to receive the sentence. If his presence at the trial could be reasonably ensured otherwise than by his arrest and detention, it would be unjust and unfair to deprive the accused of his liberty during the pendency of the criminal proceedings against him.

There is no definition of bail in the code, although the terms "bailable offence" and "non-bail able offence" been defined in section 2A of the code. Bail is the number of money defendants must post to be released from custody until their trial. Bail is not fine. It's not supposed to be used as punishment. The purpose of bail is simply to ensure that defendants will appear for trial and all pre-trial hearings for which they must be present. In bail, we pay a set amount of money to obtain our release from police custody.

The Concept of Anticipatory Bail in India

The concept of anticipatory bail comes into place when the accused may rightfully fear arrest in cases of cognizable offences. Bail is a legal relief that a person may be entitled to in order to get temporary freedom until his case is disposed of. Depending upon the gravity of the charges, a man might have the capacity to stay away from capture out and out. Notwithstanding, there are cases in which capture is made and the denounced is sans set according to the arrangements of the safeguard as given under the criminal system code. In instances of criminal cases, particularly those relating to the endowment, expectant safeguard comes as a help to many charged individual. It is actually connected for fully expecting the capture

[Suggested Read: What are Bail and the grounds for refusal?]

Procedures to get Anticipatory Bail in India

The public prosecutor will talk to the police officer concerned. If there is no fir filed, the Public prosecutor would be of the view that there were no grounds for granting anticipatory bail. The judge will agree to this and your lawyer will be verbally asked to withdraw the anticipatory bail. The lawyer will make an oral prayer for seven days pre-arrest notice in case the police formulate an intention to arrest. In all the above cases, the judge will grant a plea. An order will be passed accordingly. This is called the ‘notice bail' commonly.

If the bail application is rejected in the session's court then it would be applied in the high court. If the high court also rejects the bail, then further application on the Supreme Court is permitted. In cases when the firm has been filed, the investigating officer will send a notice of arrest. As soon as that notice is received, one should apply for anticipatory bail following the same procedure above. The high court or Court of Session may direct that any person who has been released on bail be arrested and commit him to custody on an application moved by the complainant or prosecution in case any of the conditions imposed by the court are being violated.

[Suggested Read: Different Kinds of Bail In India]

Concept of legal aid in India

Legal aid mainly means giving free legal services to the needy people who are unable to afford the advocate for the conduct of the case. The Constitution of India contains the preamble which states the aim to secure people of Indian justice-socio economic and political.

“Legal aid” is a legal support, to the poorer and weaker numbers to enable them to enforce their legal rights through the legal process. Legal aid not only means providing the legal aid within the ambit of the court but it means that providing the legal support within and outside the ambit of the court to the poorer section of the society.

Section 2(a) of the legal aid act, 2000 defines legal aid as providing legal advice, paying lawyers' fees and cost of litigation including providing any other assistance to those who suffer financial insolvency, destitution, helpless or are unable to access justice due to various socio-economic conditions.

The legal aid is not a matter of charity but it is a matter that can be claimed as a matter of right. In the Constitution of India, there was no such express provision which was dealing with the concept of legal aid. But the 42nd Amendment Act, 1976, had inserted a new Article 39(a) in the Constitution of India and a significant step in the direction of the setting up of legal aid. The relevant provisions in the code of criminal procedure and the code of civil procedure have also amended for securing equal and social justice in criminal as well as civil cases.

Importance of legal aid

Nowadays, it has become very costly to take a legal adjudicator and has become very expensive for the average people to afford a legal representative for the case. For example, if a suit is filed where one party is poor and the other party is affluent so the party who is affluent will be able to hear a competent and the best lawyer for the case as compared to the party which is poor. So the lawyer who is the best will won the case so in this case the rule of equality applies and also the rule of law also applies. So for providing justice to the poorer section of the society free legal aid should be provided to the needy.

In the case of Bandhu Mukti Morcha vs. Union of India, the former Chief Justice of India P.N. Bhagwati has observed in this case that where one of the parties to the litigant belongs to the poorer section which does not possess adequate socials and material resources where he is bound to be at the lower level as against a strong powerful opponent. So as long as India is suffering from poverty and poor and needy people are there in our Indian society so there is a need of the free legal aid to them for human rights and also the equality.

Supreme Court on legal aid services

The linkage between article 21 and also the right to free legal aid has forged the decision in Hussainara Khatoon v. The State of Bihar. In this case, the court has declared that that “there can be no doubt that speedy trial, and by speedy trial, we mean reasonably expeditious trial, is an integral and essential part of the fundamental right to life and liberty enshrined in the Article 21“. The court also stated that Article 39a of our Indian constitution states free legal aid to the needy people and its basic inalienable element are “reasonable, fair and just“.

Legal aid is really nothing else but equal justice in action. Legal aid is, in fact, the delivery system of social justice. If free legal services are not provided to such an accused, the trial itself may run the risk of being vitiated as contravening article 21 and we have no doubt that every state government would try to avoid such a possible eventuality”

3 legal aid committees have also been set up for the betterment of the needy and the weaker section of the societies. They are as follows-

  • The district legal aid committee
  • The state legal aid committee
  • The taluka legal aid committee.

Supreme Court Legal Service Committees

The Supreme Court legal services committee has been enacted under the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987. This committee has been set for the effective rendering of justice in the apex court. If a person belongs to the poor section of the society having an annual income of less than Rs. 18,000/- or belongs to scheduled caste or scheduled tribe and if a victim of natural calamity, is a woman or a child or a mentally ill or otherwise disabled person or an industrial workman or is in custody including custody in protective home, he/she is entitled to get free legal aid from the supreme court legal aid committee.

The aid so granted by the committee includes the cost of preparation of the matter and all applications connected therewith, in addition to providing an advocate for preparing and arguing the case. Any person desirous of availing legal service through the committee has to make an application to the secretary and hand over all necessary documents concerning his case to it. The committee after ascertaining the eligibility of the person provides necessary legal aid to him/her. The persons belonging to the middle-income group i.e. with income above Rs.18000/- but under Rs.120000/- per annum are eligible to get legal aid from the Supreme Court middle income group society, on nominal payments.

So the main concept of providing free legal service is to help the needy people those who are not able to afford an advocate for the justice. As in India, there is a lot of poverty and people are so poor that they are no able to afford an advocate so free legal aid is necessary to those. And the government has also made many provisions for free legal aid. Certain constitutional provisions have also been made for free legal aid.

Different Kinds of Bail In India

Bail in the bailable offence

When any person who is accused for a bailable offence then the person is arrested or detained without warrant by an police officer who is in charge of it, or appears or is brought before a Court, and is prepared at any time while in the custody of such officer or at any stage of the proceeding before such Court to give bail, such person shall be released on bail. In the case of bailable offence, one has to only file the bail bonds and no application is required.

Bail in the non-bailable offence

Non-bailable offences are those offences which are considered as serious offences where bail is a privilege and can only be granted by the court only. If a person is arrested and is under the custody and the accused has done something serious or non-bailable crime, then the person cannot ask to be released on the bail as the matter of the right.

On account of a non-bailable offence, the police can't discharge anybody on safeguard thus the captured individual needs to make an application for safeguard under the watchful eye of a judge or court. Afterthought of elements, for example, the earnestness of the offense, the odds that the blamed will meddle with the examination by altering proof or undermining witnesses or if the denounced is probably going to seek total isolation or leave the nation to get away, the court will choose whether he/she can be permitted to be let out on safeguard or not.

[Suggested Read: What are Bail and the grounds for refusal?]

In the event that somebody is rejected safeguard, he/she can engage a higher court. In the event that the police don't finish their examination within 60 days for a wrongdoing that isn't culpable with death or life detainment, at that point the charged gets safeguard. For offences that are culpable with death or life detainment, the examination must be finished up inside 90 days, or the charged will have the privilege to safeguard.

Anticipatory Bail

Law Commission of India in its 41st report suggested fusing an arrangement for Anticipatory Bail. Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code managed the Anticipatory Bail. This provision enables a man to look for safeguard fully expecting a capture on an allegation of the non-safeguard capable offence having submitted by him. It is a course to discharge a man on safeguard, issued even before the individual is captured.

[Suggested Read: How to Get Anticipatory Bail in India?]

3-Stages of Granting the Bail

  • Pre-trial Stage
  • Trial Stage
  • Post-trial Stage

General principles for a Bail

  • No prima-facie case made out
  • No specific over act
  • The benefit of doubt
  • Exceptions under CrPC
  • Delay in lodging FIR
  • Delay in investigation
  • Delay in trial
  • Long detention
  • Bail granted to co-accused
  • Plea of alibi

What is Bail and the grounds for refusal?

Bail is a set of restrictions that are forced on a suspect while pre-trial, to ensure they comply with the judicial process. In the United States, the bail mainly implies to the bail bond. A bail bond is a kind of money or the property which is deposited by a suspect to the court so that the person can be released before the pre-trial detention. And if afterwards the suspect does not present in the court after it then the bail will get forfeited and will be brought up by the charges of the crime of the “failure to appear” in the court of law. In India, the bails are mainly governed by the CrPC (Criminal Procedure Code) which defines whether the offence is bailable or non-bailable.

Bail petition can be filed in different courts such as magistrate court, Court of Session judge, high court division and appellant division.

When Can A Bail Be Refused?

The courts can refuse a person to bail for the following reasons:

  • If the court feels there is a risk of the defendant absconding
  • To prevent the defendant from committing further crimes
  • To prevent the defendant from interfering with witnesses
  • For the defendant's own protection
  • If the defendant is in prison for another offence
  • Where the court does not have sufficient information about the defendant
  • If it is following a conviction, then it is necessary to keep the defendant in custody for pre-sentence reports to be completed
  • If the defendant has breached bail condition 

Criminal Contempt – The Laws Related to Criminal Intimidation

Contempt can be classified as civil or criminal and direct or indirect. Criminal contempt can be mainly defined as the disobedient or open disrespect towards the court of law. This means that even though it might have aroused out of a civil or criminal case, but it punishes the conduct that violates the court’s rule, rather than penal statute or some criminal law.

Criminal contempt of court is punitive in nature. It is mainly defined under section 2(c) of the Contempt of Court Act, 1971. It is the more serious and the aggravated form of offence. For example, if a court issues an order addressing to the jail superintendence to release a prisoner and if he does not do so that will be considered as the “criminal contempt”.

Criminal contempt is the direct contempt and has made the judges annoyance directly. It may be committed by any person for example visitor, witnesses, police, advocates etc. Even the judges or the magistrates are not exempted from this. In case of Criminal contempt, a contemner is not allowed to put forward evidence or circumstances to justify the imputations.

The following act is the criminal contempt:-

  • scandalizes, or tends to scandalize, or lowers or tends to lower the authority of, any Court; or
  • prejudices, or interferes or tends to interfere with, the due course of any judicial proceeding; or
  • Interferes or tends to interfere with, or obstructs or tends to obstruct, the administration of justice in any other manner.

Section 503 of the IPC deals with the criminal intimidation

It states that” Whoever threatens another with an injury to his person, reputation or property, or to the person or reputation of anyone in whom that person is interested, with intent to cause alarm to that person, or to cause that person to do any act which he is not legally bound to do, or to omit to do any act which that person is legally entitled to do, as the means of avoiding the execution of such threat, commits criminal intim¬idation. Explanation.—a threat to injure the reputation of any deceased person in whom the person threatened is interested, is within this section. Illustration a, for the purpose of inducing b to desist from prosecuting a civil suit, threatens to burn B’s house. A is guilty of criminal intimidation.

Section 504 of IPC

Intentional insult with intent to provoke breach of the peace.—Whoever intentionally insults, and thereby gives provocation to any person, intending or knowing it to be likely that such provocation will cause him to break the public peace, or to commit any other offence, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.

Section 506 of IPC states the punishment for criminal intimidation

This section states that- “Whoever commits, the offence of criminal intimidation shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both;

If threat be to cause death or grievous hurt, etc- and if the threat be to cause death or grievous hurt, or to cause the destruction of any property by fire, or to cause an offence punishable with death or [imprisonment for life], or with imprisonment for a term which may extend to seven years, or to impute, unchastely to a woman, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, or with fine, or with both.

In the case Harihar Das v. the State of Bihar, in this case also there were all the ingredients of the criminal intimidation and it was declared as the criminal contempt and the punishment was also granted as mentioned under section 506 of IPC (Indian Penal Code)

Criminal contempt charges

Criminal contempt charges become separate charges from the underlying case. Unlike civil contempt sanctions, criminal contempt charges may live on after resolution of the underlying case.

One charged with criminal contempt generally gets the constitutional rights guaranteed to criminal defendants, including the right to counsel, right to put on a defence, and the right to a jury trial in certain cases. Charges of criminal contempt must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt.

However, incarceration for contempt may begin immediately, before the contempt charge is adjudicated and the sentence decided. Depending on the jurisdiction and the case, the same judge who decided to charge a person with contempt may end up presiding over the contempt proceedings. Criminal contempt can bring punishment including jail time and/or a fine.

Objectives of Legal Aid in India

Legal aid mainly means providing free legal aid services for free to the needy or the poor section of the society. These are those people who are not capable to afford a legal representative for them who can fight a case for them. So the government has brought out the service of free legal aid to the needy people. There are certain objectives of the government to establish a system of the free legal system. And the Right to Free Legal Aid is also mentioned under Article 39A of the Constitution of India.

Objectives are mentioned below: –

Right to Legal Aid in India

Free legal aid services have been set up to provide legal advice to the poor and the needy people. In India, there are a lot of poor people who are not able to earn their two times meal also. So for them, it is very difficult to afford an advocate for their case. So free legal aid is necessary for those people as it is written in our Indian constitution under Article 14 that all the people are equal to the justice should also be provided to all the person whether he is rich or poor. So free legal aid is given so that the poor who are not able to fight a case against a powerful or a rich person can also get justice

LEGAL REPRESENTATION

This means that the poor and the weaker section should also get the legal representative as they are also the citizen of India and it is our fundamental right to equality under Article 14 of the Constitution of India. So whether a person is rich or a poor he has the right to have a legal representative so that they can also get free legal aid from the government. It is written under Article 39A of the Constitution of India “Free legal aid to all the citizen of India

PUBLIC EDUCATION ON LEGAL MATTERS TO INDIGENT PEOPLE

This means that all the citizens of India should be aware of the basic rights ie, the fundamental rights which are provided to all the citizens of India so that they can exercise those powers in the court. These rights are also enforceable by the court of law.

Right to free legal aid has also become part of the fundamental rights. So the fundamental rights should be taught to the youth of our country who are the future of our country the legal rights so that no one can take advantage of it whether rich or poor.

All the citizens have the right to equality and equality before the law which is mentions=ed under article 14 of our Indian constitution.

Top 10 Laws for Protection of Employee in India

The Employee's Compensation Act, 1923

It is also known as the Workmen Compensation Act. This Act has specified the meaning of the employee under Section 2(dd) of the Act which includes railway servant, captain and crew of aircraft driver, the mechanic of motor vehicle etc. This act focuses on compensating employees if suffered injuries from an accident during the course of employment. There is an imposition of a legal obligation on employers to compensate an employee who is involved in accidents during the course of employment during official duty and not personal suffrage. The employee needs to show that it was during the work and the resulting strain which contributed to or aggravated the injury. Once the employee informs about the same the responsibility turns towards the employee as bring in the medical officer for a check-up and if the employee is recommended to doctor or any other such expenses is taken care by the employer or his industry. It is not paid directly by the employer but through Commissioner of Workmen Compensation.

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

This act states about the “protected workmen” person who fight for the right not only for himself but also for his fellow workers. They have been defined under Section 33(3)[1] as “in relation to an establishment, means a workman who, being a member of the executive or another office-bearer of a registered trade union connected with the establishment, is recognized as such in accordance with rules made in this behalf.” To protect such workmen who take one for the team, the Industrial Dispute Act has included Section 33 which protects such workmen and provides them with immunity. Basically, the company or the organisation will not take any action against such work until and unless a court order for the same. It is not an absolute immunity. The court focuses on the speedy trials as well as in a peaceful manner. The trade union presume that once the privilege is vested in the protected workmen it will remain for lifetime but it cannot be said as true since every new situation has a new solution and it will be wrong to presume that once the organisation or establishment is wrong, it will continue to be wrong for every problem.

Hence, it is considered as good law since the workmen is not suffered for raising his voice for the right.

Minimum Wages Act, 1948

India deals with poverty every day. It is a land of cheap labours from the time of colonial rule since people are not aware of their rights and potential. Illiteracy is the main cause. This act comes to the rescue where the government fix the minimum wages for the employees so that they are not been harassed by their employers and they can lead a life where their basic necessities are fulfilled. The Act defines both employee and wages as-

Employee has been defined under Section 2(i) as any person who is employed for hire or rewards to do any work, skilled or unskilled, manual or clerical, in a scheduled employment in respect of which minimum rates of wages have been fixed; and includes out-workers.

Wages is defined as wages” means all remuneration, capable of being expressed in terms of money, which would, if the terms of the contract of employment, express or implied, were fulfilled, be payable to a person employed in respect of his employment or of work done in such employment, under Section 2(h). And there are several things which are not included such as- the value of the house, gratuity, travelling allowances etc. The Act also ensures that there should not be any delay in the payment of wages. There is also provided with respect to a deduction from the salary and that only authorised deduction is allowed and should not exceed 50%.

Factories Act, 1948

This Act is for the safety, health and welfare of the workers who work in the factory. It takes care of everything from the working hours to leaves, overtime, health check-up, employment etc. The term factory is defined under Section 2(m) of the Act. The must be a manufacturing process going on or any such kind, which has also been defined under the act. It is applicable to a person who employs more than 10 persons who are working with aid or 20 persons without the aid. The act also makes sure that the factory is clean and there is no infection or nuisance, there must be proper ventilation. There must be drinking water which must be clean; also the washroom must be clean and hygienic. Proper safety measure must be present as sometimes factory place could be dangerous, the first-aid box should be present and during orientation how to use it during an emergency must be taught. If certain machine requires fencing it must be done carefully.

Employees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952[2]

This Act was enacted to secure the future of the employee after he/she retires or if there is the sudden death of the employee the family member can get support. It is compulsory in nature. It is applied to every industry where more than 10 people are employed.  Maximum of 12% is deducted from the basic salary; the employee can increase the percentage according to one’s need that would be a personal choice. The best part is that employee can withdraw or take an advance in case of an emergency such as housing, medical care, housing etc. Interest rate provided is generally higher than the market value. There is also exemption provided that the employer shows that there is better scheme than the usual Provident Fund.

There shall be a central and the state board that is allotted with duties and function under the act.

Maternity Benefit Act, 1961

Every pregnant woman has a right to claim maternity leave, if not given employer will be liable. This act was brought into existence because if women get pregnant they had to leave the job. To overcome this government brought this Act. The other flaw that the act faces is that employer tries to avoid taking women since they have a vacant seat where he cannot appoint any person and also they have to pay for it too. But with time things are changing and in a certain private company, the maternity benefit is given than what is prescribed by the government. The aim of the act is to give women economic independence even when they are pregnant and could not make it to the office. There is the famous case with respect to the same Air India v. Nargesh Meerza[3] in this the woman was a flight attendant and was removed from her job because she was pregnant. The company laid down that if women if 35 years and above, first time pregnant or married with the first four years of service will be terminated from the job. The Supreme Court stated that these conditions are an infringement of Article 15 and16 of Indian Constitution and therefore is void. Also, these rules were not applied to men but only women. The leave period has increased from 12 weeks to 24 weeks.

Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972

This act deals in payment of gratuity to an employee who deals in factories, mines, oilfields, railway companies, shops etc. which may be incidental in nature. It may continue even if the number of an employee falls below 10 in number. The gratuity will be provided to employees who have completed the service for at least 5 years except in case of death and disablement. Gratuity means a benefit given at the time of retirement to its workmen after serving the employer for a long duration of time and bringing in the prosperity the industry needs. There is provision for nomination as the paperwork is cut down and the procedure becomes simplified if the employee becomes disabled or if there is sudden death. The government can exempt the current program with a better provision. There is also provision for recovery of gratuity in case the employer fails to pay the same. This brings in the security among the employees as there is a guarantee for the same.

Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act, 1976

The object of this Act is same as the name suggest to abolish the whole system of bonded labour in order to prevent the exploitation it can be economic or physical or mental of the weaker and poor section of people with respect to their occupation.

The idea of bonded labour starts again from the fact of illiteracy and that the labours parent or grandparents took some loan which they were unable to pay and which was charged at a very high interest rate, now are forced to work throughout their life at a very minimal wage or no wage as to repayment of the same.

It is the outcome of customary obligations, forced labour, beggar or indebtedness under which a debtor agrees to render service. It is also known as vetti, hari, sanjwat etc. The employee or rather the aggrieved person can go to District Magistrate with his complain or any other person on his behalf, The District Magistrate is the chairman of the Vigilance Committee which is formed under the Act. There are several rules and duties attached to them under the provision. It is not compulsory to go to the District Magistrate but any other member who is part of Vigilance Committee. To have a bonded labour is an offence and is punishable under the act with the imprisonment which may extend to three years and also a fine of rupees two thousand.

Equal Remuneration Act, 1976

As the name suggests Equal Remuneration Act, 1976 provides for equal payment to both men and women on the same position. It makes sure that there is no differentiation based on sex or gender of the person. It is also applied in the matters of recruitment as well.

Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013

Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan[4] was the first time when the Supreme court laid down the guidelines which focused towards the prevention of sexual harassment at workplace. These guidelines were applied to both organised and unorganised sector of employment and to provide a safe environment at the workplace for the women. Workplace is not confined to the office, it could be school, college whether full time working or part-time rules are the same and these guidelines are legally binding upon them. They should not feel a disadvantage at any stage. There are different types of sexual harassment-

  1. Demand and request  for sexual favour
  2. Threat about employment status
  3. Promise for preferential treatment
  4. Showing pornography
  5. Humiliating treatment that affects health etc.

There is also an Internal Complaint Committee which has a minimum of four members and the presiding officer must be a woman and one member from the NGO who is into the cause. There is also provision for Local Complaints Committee where one woman from SC or ST or OBC must be present. Each member can hold the office from 3 years only. There is the whole procedure to look into the case and if not satisfied with the judgement it is appealable. And if there is no proof no action will be taken. The employer needs to organise workshop regarding the same and make sure that the employee understand the consequence of the same.


[1] INDUSTRIAL DISPUTES ACT, 1947,  (Central)   -Current as on 22 July 2018

[2] https://epfindia.gov.in/site_docs/PDFs/Downloads_PDFs/EPFAct1952.pdf

[3] (1981) 4 SCC 335

[4] (1997) 6 SCC 241

Right of Legal Aid in India – 11 Provisions You Must Know

The concept of seeking justice cannot be equated with the value of dollars. Money plays no role in seeking justice. 

                                                                                    -Justice Blackmun in Jackson v Bish

Legal aid mainly means providing free legal services to the poor and the needy people who are not able to afford an advocate for their case, or a legal proceeding in any court or, tribunal or before a judicial authority. Legal aid was mainly introduced for the very first time by the Justice P.N. Bhagwati under the legal aid committee formed in 1971. According to the justice Bhagwati, legal aid means providing the legal aid to those people who are not able to afford so that they can also get justice and he also wanted to make it easily available to the poor section of the societies. Legal is available to anybody on the road.

The legal service authorities act (1987) has established a nationwide network to provide free and competent legal aid to the poor and also to organise Lok Adalats for promoting equal justice. Lok Adalat is a statutory forum for conciliatory settlement of legal disputes. It has been given the status of a civil court. Its awards are enforceable, binding on the parties and final as no appeal lies before any court against them. There are many provisions under Indian constitution as well as many other acts in which certain laws have been made to provide legal aid to the needy or poor people

There are many other services which are offered by legal service authority in our country. They are as follows-

  • The payment of court fees and other fees are paid by them;
  • All the charges are also paid by them which have been incurred in preparing, drafting and filing of any legal proceedings;
  • All the charges which the legal practitioner or the legal advisor are also paid by them;
  • All the cost of paperwork, including printing, translation etc

The legal service authorities act, 1987 defines legal service under Section 2(1)(c) that ‘legal service’ includes the interpretation of any service in the conduct of any case or other legal proceedings before any court or other authority or tribunal and the giving of advice on any other legal matter. This act was mainly made with an objective to provide free and competent legal service to the weaker section of the society.

PROVISIONS IN INDIAN LAW WHICH GIVE YOU RIGHT TO LEGAL AID ARE AS FOLLOWS-.

  • Article 14 of the Indian constitution states the equality before the law so all are equal before the law without any discrimination on the basis of caste, creed, colour, sex etc. The preamble of the Constitution secures to its citizen, social, economic and political justice.  Article 14 of the Constitution makes it clear that the State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the equal protection of the laws within the territory of India. The aim of Article 14 is to ensure equal justice. The guarantee of equal justice is meaningless if the poor or illiterate or weak persons cannot enforce their rights because of their poverty or illiteracy or weakness. 
  • The constitution of India also provides under article 21 of the fundamental rights including protection of life and liberty  and provisions of legal aid are an integral part of this section
  • Article 39A of the Indian constitution also states that there should be equal justice and free legal aid. This explains that whether the person is rich or poor equal treatment should be given whether it is the case of justice.
  • Section 303 of the code of civil procedure, states that the accused in any case is entitled to have the right to be defended by the pleader of his own choice and section 304 of the CPC states that if such kind of person doesn't have sufficient means to arrange a pleader for himself then he shall be provided with free legal aid at the expense of the state.
  • Article 10 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights 1948 by which every state has been charged with a duty to ensure to an accused 'A fair and Public Hearing.
  • Article22 (1) of the Constitution of India declare that no person who is arrested shall be denied the right to consult and to be defended by a legal practitioner of his choice.
  • Order 33 of the Civil Procedure Code provides in respect of the suit by an indigent person.  On the application to sue as an indigent person is being granted the plaintiff shall not be liable to pay court fee and in case he is not represented by a pleader, the Court may, if the circumstances of the case so require, assign a pleader to him.  This benefit has now been extended to the dependant also.
  • A separate legislation, The Legal Services Authority Act, 1987 has been enacted to constitute the Legal Service Authorities to provide free and competent legal services to the weaker sections of the society to ensure that opportunities for securing justice are not denied to any citizen by reason of economic or other disabilities and to organise Lok Adalats to secure that the operation of the legal system promotes justice. The Legal Services Authorities Act establishes statutory legal services authorities at the National, State and District level.  It makes provisions in relation to Lok Adalat.  The main object of the Lok Adalat is to provide quick justice at less expense

District, State and National Legal Service Authorities In India

The Legal Services Authorities Act 1987 provides for the setting up of statutory legal services authorities. They are set at the National, State, and District levels. These authorities give free legal aid to a person if he/she is not capable of bearing the expenditure. These all authorities have mainly been established so as to provide effective monitoring of legal aid programmes. It also provides the composition of such authorities. 

DISTRICT LEGAL SERVICE AUTHORITY

Section 9 and Section 10 of the Legal Services Authority Act, 1987 deals with Composition and functions of District Authority. District Authority means a District Legal Services Authority constituted under Section 9 of the said Act. Composition and Functions of District Legal Services Authority are as Follows:

COMPOSITION:

The State Government shall in consultation with the Chief Justice of the High Court, constitute a body to be called the District Legal Services Authority for every District in the State. These authorities have been made to exercise the powers and perform the functions which are conferred or assigned to the District Authority under this Act.

District authority shall consist of the following persons-

  1. The district judge who shall be its chairman; and
  2. Such number of other members, possessing such experience and qualifications as may be prescribed by the State Government, to be nominated by that Government in consultation with the Chief Justice of the High Court.

TENURE:

The tenure of office and other conditions relating to the Members and Secretary of the District Authority as may be determined by regulations made by the State Authority in consultation with the Chief Justice of the High Court.

  • All orders and decisions of the District Authority shall be substantial by the Secretary or by any other officer of the District Authority which is duly authorised by the Chairman of that Authority.

FUNCTIONS:

The district authority may perform the following functions-

  1. co-ordinate the activities of the Taluk Legal Services Committee and other legal services in the District;
  2. Organise Lok Adalat within the Districts; and
  3. Perform such other functions as the State Authority may fix by regulations.

STATE LEGAL SERVICE AUTHORITY

Section 3 of the Legal Services Act 1987 Provides that the Central Government shall constitute a Central Authority called the National Legal Services Authority. Further Section 6 of the Act provides a constitution of State Legal Services Authority.

COMPOSITION:

  1. every state should consist of the state body and exercise all those powers and functions which  are conferred on or assigned to a state authority under the prescribed act
  2. a state authority should consist of –
  • The Chief Justice of the High Court who shall be the Patron-in-Chief; a serving or retired Judge of the High Court, to be nominated by the Governor, in consultation with the Chief Justice of the High Court, who shall be the Executive Chairman; and such number of other Members, possessing such experience and qualifications
  •  The State Government shall, in consultation with the Chief Justice of the High Court, appoint a person belonging to the State Higher Judicial Service not lower in rank than that of a District Judge, as the Member-Secretary of the State Authority, to exercise such powers and perform such duties under the Executive Chairman of the State Authority as may be prescribed by that Government or as may be assigned to him by the executive chairman of that authority

TENURE:

The terms of office and other conditions relating thereto, of Members and the Member-Secretary of the State Authority shall be such as may be prescribed by the State Government in consultation with the Chief Justice of the High Court.

FUNCTIONS:

Section 7 of the said Act, deals with Functions of The State Authority. 

  1. To conduct Lok Adalat at various levels
  2. To settle all the disputes by the way of negotiation, arbitration and conciliation
  3. To bring into effect the policies and the directions of the central authority
  4. To also carry out the legal literacy campaign programme throughout the union territories
  5. To publicize legal aid so that the needy people can ask for the help whenever they need it
  6. To provide the legal service that satisfies the criteria of legal services authorities act, 1987.

NATIONAL LEGAL SERVICE AUTHORITY

Legal service authority act, 1987 provides that the central government shall constitute a body called the national legal service authority under section 3 of the act. It exercises the powers and performs the functions conferred on, or assigned to the central authority under this authority.

COMPOSITION:

The composition is mainly mentioned under sub-section 2 of section 3 provides that the central government shall consist of the following-

  • The chief justice of India who shall be the patron-in-chief;
  • a serving or retired Judge of the Supreme Court to be nominated by the President, in consultation with the Chief Justice of India, who shall be the Executive Chairman; and
  • such number of other members, possessing such experience and qualifications, as may be prescribed by the Central Government, to be nominated by that government in consultation

QUALIFICATION FOR MEMBERS:         

According to Sub-section 3 of Section 3 of the Act, the Central Government shall in consultation with the Chief Justice of India, appoint a person to be the Member-Secretary of the Central Authority, possessing such experience and qualifications as may be prescribed by that Government, to exercise such powers and perform such duties under the Executive Chairman of the Central Authority as may be prescribed by that Government or as may be assigned to him by the executive chairman of that authority

Rule 5 provides that for a person to be a Member- Secretary of the Central Authority, he must be-

  • An officer of Indian legal service who has held a post, not below the rank of additional secretary to the government of India
  • A member of the state higher judicial service who has held the post of the district judge at least 3 years,
  • An officer of order organised central services who has held a post of joint secretary to the joint secretary to the government of India for a minimum period of 5 years.

TERMS OF OFFICE AND OTHER CONDITIONS

According to Section 3 (4) of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987,  the terms of office and other conditions related to the Members and Member-Secretary of the Central Authority shall be such as may be prescribed by the Central Government in consultation with the Chief Justice of India

(b) a serving or retired Judge of the Supreme Court to be nominated by the President, in consultation with the Chief Justice of India, who shall be the Executive Chairman; and

(c) such number of other members, possessing such experience and qualifications, as may be prescribed by the Central Government, to be nominated by that government in consultation with the Chief Justice of India.

QUALIFICATION FOR MEMBERS:

A Person shall not be qualified for nomination as a Member of the Central Authority unless he is –

  • An eminent person in the field of Law; or
  • A person of repute who is especially interested in the implementation of the Legal Services  Schemes; or an eminent social worker who is engaged in the upliftment of the weaker sections of the people, including Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, Women, Children, rural and urban labour.

According to Sub-section 3 of Section 3 of the Act, the Central Government shall in consultation with the Chief Justice of India, appoint a person to be the Member-Secretary of the Central Authority, possessing such experience and qualifications as may be prescribed by that Government, to exercise such powers and perform such duties under the Executive Chairman of the Central Authority as may be prescribed by that Government or as may be assigned to him by the Executive Chairman of that Authority.

Rule 5 provides that for a person to be a Member- Secretary of the Central Authority, he must be:-

1)  an officer of Indian legal service who has held a post, not below the rank of Additional Secretary to the Government of India.

2) a Member of the State Higher Judicial Service who has held the post of the District Judge at least 3 years, or

3) an officer of order organised Central Services who has held a post of Joint Secretary to the Government of India equivalent to the minimum period of 3 years . or

4) an officer of the organised State Services who has held a post equivalent to the Joint Secretary to the Government of India for a minimum period of 5 years.

Preference shall be given to the person possessing administrative, and legal experience.

TERMS OF OFFICE AND OTHER CONDITIONS

According to Section 3 (4) of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987,  the terms of office and other conditions related to the Members and Member-Secretary of the Central Authority shall be such as may be prescribed by the Central Government in consultation with the Chief Justice of India