Syeda Rahimunnisa Vs. Malan Bi (Dead) by L.Rs. [Supreme Court of India, 03-10-2016]

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION [J. CHELAMESWAR]AND[ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE] JJ. October 03, 2016 CIVIL APPEAL Nos. 2875-2879 OF 2010 Syeda Rahimunnisa …….Appellant(s) VERSUS Malan Bi (Dead) by L.Rs. & Anr. Etc. …Respondent(s) J U D G M E N T Abhay Manohar Sapre, J. 1. These appeals by spec …

Read more at Case Laws

International Confederation of Societies of Authors and Composers (CISAC) Vs. Aditya Pandey [Supreme Court of India, 20-09-2016]

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION [PRAFULLA C. PANT] [RANJAN GOGOI]JJ. SEPTEMBER 20, 2016. CIVIL APPEAL NOs. 9412-9413 OF 2016 (arising out of S.L.P (C) Nos. 2380-2381 OF 2014) International Confederation of Societies of Authors and Composers (CISAC) … Appellants Versus Aditya Pandey & ors …Respo …

Read more at Case Laws

13 Case Laws on Amendment of pleadings under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC

“17. Amendment of pleadings.– The Court may at any stage of the proceedings allow either party to alter or amend his pleadings in such manner and on such terms as may be just, and all such amendments shall be made as may be necessary for the purpose of determining the real questions in controversy between the parties:- Provided that no ap …

Read more at Case Laws

10 Leading Decisions on Scope of Section 197 CrPC

Case Laws on Section 197 Cr.P.C. 1. Sankaran Moitra v. Sadhina Das,(2006) 4 SCC 584 The law in this regard has been delineated by the Apex Court more particularly in paragraphs 12 to 21 thereof, after relying on some of the leading decisions on that point, which reads as follows: 2. Shreekantiah Ramayya Munipalli v. State of Bombay [(1995) …

Read more at Case Laws

10 Leading Decisions on Scope of Section 197 CrPC

Case Laws on Section 197 Cr.P.C. 1. Sankaran Moitra v. Sadhina Das,(2006) 4 SCC 584 The law in this regard has been delineated by the Apex Court more particularly in paragraphs 12 to 21 thereof, after relying on some of the leading decisions on that point, which reads as follows: 2. Shreekantiah Ramayya Munipalli v. State of Bombay [(1995) …

Read more at Case Laws

In Re Vs. Pradhuman Kumar Srivastava [Allahabad High Court, 21-09-2016]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD Hon’ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. &Hon’ble Shashi Kant,J. Delivered on 21.09.2016 CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CRIMINAL) No. – 17 of 2015 Applicant :- In Re Opposite Party :- Pradhuman Kumar Srivastava, Advocate and 9 Ors. Counsel for Applicant :- A.G.A.,Sudhir Mehrotra;Counsel for Opposite Party :- Dh …

Read more at Case Laws